Indonesian Government Must Listen to the United Nations: Stop Attacks on Sugar Union! Actualité Actualidade Actualidad
Sugar around the world →

IUF website - Tuesday 20 June 2006

The authorities, says the ILO, must take immediate action to rectify illegal anti-union measures taken by private and public sugar employers against the IUF-affiliated FSPM TG, beginning with the immediate reinstatement of the union's illegally dismissed president Daud Sukamto.

The FSPM TG was established in February last year as a federation of unions from private and state-owned mills, plantations and sugar distilleries. Daud Sukamto, who headed the local union at Gunung Madu Plantation in Sumatra, was elected FSPM TG President at the federation's founding convention. On March 14, he announced that his local union would leave the SPSI, the union established under the military dictatorship. Shortly thereafter, he was suspended from his job, then formally sacked with government authorization on June 21 when his dismissal appeal was rejected. Immediately after being fired, he was evicted from the home provided for him and his family by Gunung Madu Plantations. Since then he has been living with his family in a one-room dwelling and has suffered three major heart attacks. Gunung Madu, the country's largest sugar enterprise, is 45% owned by the Hong Kong-based Kuok Investment Group of billionaire Robert Kuok. The remaining shares are held by Suharto family and cronies. His sacking was a classic example of Indonesia's three-way collusion between emloyers, yellow unions and the government.
The reason for his dismissal? According to the company, Daud had committed "gross misconduct" in recommending that union members reject a management proposal in January as part of the biannual CBA negotiations. The administrative decision authorizing his dismissal accepted this claim and ignored a well-known ruling by the country's Constitution court that the law permitting dismissals on these grounds was unconstitutional and required amendment.

The union fought back with protest actions and demonstrations, backed by international support from IUF affiliates around the world. The IUF filed a complaint against the government of Indonesia with the Freedom of Association Committee of the ILO. However, union-busting did not stop with Daud's dismissal.

Harassment continued with management and yellow-union pressure on the local unions at the state-owned PTPN X and XI complexes. The authorities attempted to retroactively nullify the federation's legal registration. The yellow unions issued increasingly strident written threats to commit violence against FSPM leaders and the IUF, privately at first, then publicly. When the authorities refused to respond - privately informing the IUF that open threats of violence against union leaders were "no big deal" - the IUF alerted the ILO. The IUF demanded protection for the threatened IUF and FSPM TG representatives and prosecution of the officials who had threatened them (and copied their threats to the Manpower Minister!). There was no official response.

The federation and the local unions have not bowed to pressure; they continue to organize sugar workers, but face new forms of victimization and intimidation. At Gempolkrep Sugar Mill, police were called in by management and posted in and outside the mill to intimidate union members in the lead-up to the milling season. At this mill and at least two others, seasonal workers who took part in the March 13 demonstration for union rights in Surabaya were not summoned to report for work once the milling season got underway. Union officers have been transferred to remote workplaces far from their local members. Management and yellow unions regularly denounce the FSPM TG. Management at a PTPN XI mill ordered workers to swear a religious oath not to join the FSPM-TG affiliated union at the enterprise and pleading allegiance to company policy (and property).

At this year's June session of the ILO's International Labour Conference, the Committee on Freedom of Association delivered a clear decision in response to the IUF complaint (the full decision is available on the ILO's website by clicking here). The Committee upheld the IUF's charges on all counts, and issued the following recommendations: